top of page
Search

What If the First Sin Was Trying to Be More Moral?

Updated: 17 hours ago


If this is your first visit to That Church By the Vape Shop, welcome. Pull up a chair. We’re the internet equivalent of a storefront church in a sketchy area. People who feel like they don’t belong in polished religious spaces are exactly the people Jesus seemed to enjoy hanging out with.


The short version of what we do here is this:


  • Jesus finished the job.


Forgiveness is not partial, probationary, or performance-based. A surprising number of Bible passages make more sense once you realize God isn’t trying to turn you into a slightly improved version of Adam under rules: He’s giving you life through Christ.


This brings us to a question inspired by an issue someone has with my commentary on Genesis:


What if the first sin was trying to be more moral?


Before people start clutching their pearls, let me explain, please. 



The Traditional Explanation (Which I’m Not Completely Throwing Under the Bus)


Let's talk about the worst self-improvement project in human history. I’m not talking about CrossFit. Most people summarize the fall of humanity like this:


  • God said don’t eat the fruit.

  • Adam and Eve ate the fruit.

  • Therefore the core problem is disobedience, pride, and humanity becoming sinful.


That’s not wrong. It’s just… incomplete. If you look carefully at the text, the fruit wasn’t labeled:


“Fruit of the Tree of Doing Bad Stuff.”


It was about the knowledge of good and evil. The temptation wasn’t merely rebellion, it was this:


“You will be like God.”


That sounds suspiciously like trying to upgrade your moral status, be more godly, be better... 



A Strange Detail in Genesis 1 We Usually Skip


Before any fruit-related poor life choices occurred, God repeatedly evaluated His creation and said something important:


“It was good.”


And when humans showed up?


“Very good.”


That was God’s assessment. What did humanity do with this glowing review?


We said: “Okay, but what if we could become extra good? Can we get graded according to a rubric?”


And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the first recorded instance of religious people trying to out-moral God.


Which, if you’ve ever attended certain churches, you know is still happening.

The snake's whole pitch was essentially:


"What if you could be MORE moral? What if you could evaluate good and evil yourself? What if you became the kind of being who has opinions about ethics? Have you considered that 'very good' might not be your final form? What if you could level up? Have you considered becoming… more enlightened?”


And it’s as if Eve was like, “Is there a workbook?” That’s humanity right there. We will listen to anybody if they sound confident enough.


Mr. Scalybutt: “Hey… you want to start judging everything?”


Humanity: “Oh we LOVE judging everything. We’re DEFINITELY qualified for that.” 


Meanwhile, every day on the internet proves we were not ready, not even a little bit.


In other words, Adam and Eve didn’t just disobey, they distrusted God’s evaluation of them. They behaved as if their Creator was unqualified to assess them.



The First Attempt at Self-Improvement Religion


Most people think the first sin was simply:


“Don’t eat fruit.” Eats fruit. Boom. Sin.


Think about what happened immediately after they ate the fruit.


They didn’t start murdering people.


They started fixing themselves.


Immediately, they realize they’re naked. The first result of humanity gaining moral awareness was: “I can feel air on my lower-than-lower abdominal area/region.” Fig leaves. Covering. Self-correction. Moral management. Humanity invented pants out of panic. God gave humans paradise, and we immediately wanted to form a committee to improve it.


That’s it.


That’s the fall of man.


You can almost hear God going: “Guys… you were already good.” Humans had already launched a project called: Operation Earn It.


God’s response to their effort was not: “Excellent initiative, humans.”


This project has been running nonstop for several thousand years and includes:


  • Religious scorecards

  • Moral ladders

  • Passive-aggressive prayer requests

  • People who say things like “bless her heart” with a straight face.


Humans have been inventing increasingly complicated fig leaves, including:


  • Theology degrees

  • Church politics

  • That one guy who corrects your Greek pronunciation during Bible study.


You know who you are.




This Sounds Weirdly Familiar


Fast forward to the New Testament:


Paul explains that humans are still doing the exact same thing.


In Romans 3, Paul basically says: No one is righteous through the law. All fall short. Righteousness comes apart from the law through faith in Christ. Humanity’s long-running attempt to climb back into Eden by moral performance is futile. In Romans 4, Paul basically says that since Abraham was declared righteous before the law was given, before religious achievement became a thing, etc., God justifies believers without their moral résumé (Genesis 15:6). In Romans 5, Paul contrasts Adam and Christ. Adam’s act brought condemnation. Christ’s act brought justification and life. The solution is not “try harder than Adam”, it’s receive what Christ did. 


Adam had ONE RULE and a perfect environment and still fumbled. One rule, a garden, no traffic, no mortgage, no taxes, no wage garnishment or child support, no arguing on social media… Yet, he couldn't do it. How can anyone’s plan be to succeed where that guy failed, but with MORE temptations and a worse starting position?



The Passage That Really Makes This Click


Romans 10 contains what might be one of the most misunderstood critiques of religion in the Bible.


Paul says this about historical Israel and the people of his time:


“Not knowing the righteousness of God and seeking to establish their own…” (Romans 10:3)


Let that sink in. The problem wasn’t that they didn’t care about righteousness. These were not casual people. These were the most religiously dedicated humans on the planet. They weren't out here skipping prayer and eating cheeseburgers on Yom Kippur. They were working HARD. The problem was that they were trying to produce it themselves.


Back to Paul:


“Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” (Romans 10:4)


He said it’s The End. Past tense. Done. Finished. The project has been completed by Someone else; don’t show up to the job site with your own tools for no reason. Stop eating fruit from the tree of trying to become morally acceptable.

God declaring Christians, aka people who believe Jesus Christ is who He says He is and did what He said he would, righteous in His sight merely for showing up absolutely infuriates the Accuser’s Moral Achievement Department.



So What If…


What if the core human problem wasn’t just sinning?


What if it was also trying to manage goodness independently of God’s grace?


Consider:

  • The Pharisees (hyper-moral, but missing the point). They were so morally rigorous that they made up extra rules to protect their rules, which is like putting a fence around your fence. The humans around Jesus during His time on Earth missed the point so completely that they crucified the point.

  • The prodigal son’s older brother (technically obedient, spiritually furious).

  • Religious systems that accidentally turn Jesus into a performance review



Why This Matters Today


There are plenty of “church people” who secretly believe God gave them grace as a starter pack and now expects them to finish the job. A lot of modern Christianity runs on a theology that sounds like this:


  1. Jesus covers your past.

  2. Now don't embarrass Him.


That sounds an awful lot like Genesis 3, Part Two: This Time With Bible Verses. We basically told Jesus, "Thanks for the assist, we'll take it from here," and then immediately started sewing.


Instead of having to win the Spiritual Olympics after our forgiveness at salvation, we can know that Jesus completed His mission. We can watch certain “religious” people panic because they had a clipboard ready for us.


The Gospel Is Genuinely Weirder Than We Make It


Paul's actual message — the one that got him thrown in jail repeatedly, which tells you it was genuinely disruptive — is much weirder and much better: Jesus is God, and He did a perfect job of saving believers, whether Jewish people or Gentiles or whatever. God doesn't wait for you to become righteous. Through Christ, God justifies people while they’re still the kind of people who would eat suspicious fruit recommended by a talking reptile.



The Real Reversal of the Fall


If Genesis 3 involved distrusting God’s exclusive authority to call us “good,” then the gospel is about the moment when someone finally says: “Okay… I’ll take God at His word.”


That’s not because we improve enough, but because Jesus already finished the work. We think we can improve ourselves, but God already did something better through Christ. We died with Him. We rose from the dead with Him. We have His eternal life in us now. 


The crazy thing is, if you live with that truth in mind, you will be “more gooder” than you were. Have a nice day.



That Church By the Vape Shop: We're out here. Come as you are. The fig leaves are optional, and also they don't work.



 
 
 

Comments


Belief in Jesus is essential. The Old Covenant had God on one side and humans on the other, and the humans were doomed to fail. The New Covenant is based on the strength of a promise God made to God. We who are safely in His hand can't mess it up. Jesus prayed that those who believe in Him would be united with Him in John 17:20-26, and Ephesians 2:6 says that He got what He asked for. Our sins demand death, but we have already died with Christ (Galatians 2:20); we enjoy His eternal life in union with Him (Colossians 3:4, 1 Corinthians 6:17).

Sound Board at Rock Show

 

 

 

 

 

 

bottom of page